Research
- any mercury amalgam dental fillings which haven’t been removed
- organohalogens (dioxins, furans, etc.) and other toxics accumulated through diet and other exposures (this is unavoidable, though a vegan/vegetarian diet will minimize exposure and toxin accumulation)
- any plutonium pacemakers which haven’t been removed
- silicone breast implants, which can contain PVC, Methylene Chloride and other toxic chemicals
- other metal or plastic implants in humans
- radioactive or toxic tracers or testing chemicals from animal experimentation (for animal carcass incinerators)
- metal or plastic implants of tracking chips in pets (for pet crematoria)
- This 2003 study shows that the risk of stillbirth was 4% higher and the risk of the life threatening brain abnormality anencephalus was 5% higher among babies whose mothers lived near to crematoria. More details here.
- Canada’s Interior Health Authority did a literature review and “concluded that fumes from crematoriums are potentially harmful and that they should not be located close to a residential area.” It also “found that particulate matter, which can be inhaled deep into lung tissue, is the chief threat.” (see “Put a lid on fumes from cremation,” Vancouver Sun, 5/12/2006)
- Public Health Impact of Crematoria (report by Chief Medical Officer of British Columbia outlining mercury, dioxin, particulate matter and other emissions concerns; report states that crematoria could have a negative impact on health and should not be located in residential neighborhoods)
- Summary of References on Mercury Emissions from Crematoria (November 3, 2008 – by John Reindl, P.E., retired from Dane County, Wisconsin Department of Public Works; please send comments and feedback here)
- Conclusions of Grinnell community residents studying mercury emissions from crematoria (good compilation of research on crematoria mercury emissions; see documentation and links at bottom of page)
- Crematoria in the UK emit 11% of all the mercury released by industry and power plants (Your fillings will live on after your death to kill the environment, Sunday Herald, UK, 2/11/2001)
- Mercury emissions from crematoria (UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs report, 2003)
- 2005 study shows that crematoria can’t meet mercury and dioxin limits
- Public Health Impact of Crematoria (report by Chief Medical Officer of British Columbia)
- Roadmap For Mercury” (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006)
- Chemical Profile for Mercury (Health impact info from Scorecard.org)
- Mercury Fact Sheet (NJ Department of Health)
- Sweden: Pull Mercury from Mouths of Dead (Planet Ark, 5/21/2004)
- California: Pulling Teeth (From the June 8-14, 2000 issue of Metro, Silicon Valley’s Weekly Newspaper)
- EPA data on dioxin emissions from crematoria (crematoria-related excerpts from EPA’s Dioxin Inventory)
- 2005 study shows that crematoria can’t meet mercury and dioxin limits
- Public Health Impact of Crematoria (report by Chief Medical Officer of British Columbia)
- Dioxin Homepage
- 3,205 pounds of tires;
- 320 pounds of trash in a trash incinerator; or
- 426 pounds of hazardous waste in a hazardous waste incinerator
Property Value Effects
This 2015 White Paper was published related to a proposed crematorium in Oklahoma (note: the appendix section has source information in this paper) – link to download here https://no2crematory.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/crematory-white-paper-bethany-ok.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3B5bKW-0BIuWZy_y_MQOAcfLIdvcaUyKDRwcEqAj5Crm60qt8Lm7RYWvg
Note: The area was zoned COMMERCIAL, not even residential. The paper is 113 pages long. It concludes that “recent studies give a cone of depression with a maximum loss of approximately 17.5% and an estimated zone of influence of 0.5 miles.” Estimating possible impact based on these calculations, Middletown residents within 0.5 miles (2600 feet) should contemplate the possible loss of 17% or more on their property value. Estimating 200 homes in the immediate vicinity, the combined value is greater than 100 million dollars, so that would result a loss of over 17 million dollars to all of us just on those immediate homes, not accounting for other potential impact resonating from these property values lowering.
Official Medical and Scientific References On Health Dangers
These references are in PubMed and other scientific sources. This is NOT a complete list of references
Fine Particles (PM 2.5) Questions and Answers
What is Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5)?
How can PM2.5 affect my health?
Are there ways to reduce my exposure to PM2.5?
https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm
Mercury emission from crematoria
http://old.iss.it/publ/anna/2006/3/423369.pdf
Data on amount of mercury per body ….
Anna Santarsiero(a), Gaetano Settimo(a) and Elena Dell’Andrea(b)
(a)Dipartimento di Ambiente e Connessa Prevenzione Primaria,
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
(b)Azienda Regionale per la Prevenzione e Protezione Ambientale del Veneto (ARPAV),
Dipartimento di Venezia, Mestre (Venezia), Italy
Indirizzo per la corrispondenza (Address for correspondence): Anna Santarsiero, Dipartimento di Ambiente e Connessa
Prevenzione Primaria, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Roma. E-mail: [email protected].
Summary. The purpose of this study, undertaken at a cremator representing an example of current equipment and cremation practices in use in Italy, is to assess the possible mercury emitted during cremation and substantiate the current data available. This paper reports some preliminary results concerning mercury and total particulate matter emissions during three cremation processes. The obtained results gave a mercury concentration ranging from 0.005 to 0.300 mg/m3
and a mercury emission factor ranging from
0.036 to 2.140 g/corpse cremated. The total particulate matter concentration range was 1.0 to 2.4 mg/m3
https://www.foxnews.com/health/mans-radioactive-remains-spread-radiation-all-over-cremation-chamber
Fox News: Published 4 days ago
Man’s radioactive remains spread radiation all over cremation chamber.
The researchers found a maximum Geiger-counter reading of 25,000 counts per minute on the crematory equipment. That translates to an exposure of 7.5 millirem per hour for someone in direct contact with the equipment — much more than is considered safe
= =
Radioactive Material Transferred by Cancer Patient’s Body Contaminated an Arizona Crematorium
Researchers also found traces of a different radioactive isotope, likely linked with a separate cremation, in a worker’s urine
= =
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/dec/26/nation/na-cremate26
They are concerned about what they see as a potential health risk to the living — mercury being released into the atmosphere from dental fillings of the cremated.
= =
https://careertrend.com/list-5932595-crematorium-dangers.html
Crematorium Dangers
= =
http://www.ethicianfamilycemetery.org/articlecrem.html
Cremation a hazard to the living?
= =
The fact that this permit was approved is surprising because there is strong scientific evidence that crematoriums produce dangerous pollutants which are linked with serious health problems, especially for children. These pollutants include mercury, dioxins, dibenzofurans, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and hydrogen chloride.
= =
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1633311/
Hidden hazards of cremation
= =
Why Crematories Are A Danger To The Surrounding Environment
= =
With more Americans choosing cremation, and an increasing number of patients getting treated with pharmaceuticals that contain radiation, more attention to the issue is needed, one of the research letter’s authors from the Mayo Clinic in Arizona told The Arizona Republic.
= =
https://matthewscremation.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/radioactive-seeds-cremation-whats-the-risk/
“Regardless, it’s best to assume the worst. …”
= =
https://www.letyourlovegrow.com/eco-friendly-burial/burying-ashes-harmful-to-environment/
Why Is Burying Ashes So Bad for the Environment?
= =
https://www.calgarymemorial.com/effect-of-cremation-on-environment.html
Calcified compounds within cremains can contain metals such as lead, boron, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, tin, lithium, magnesium, manganese, nicket and strontium. Metals such as aresenic and selenium, though present in a live human body, are volatile and decompose quickly upon burning. Levels of toxic metals in cremains are not regulated although all non-combustible materials must be removed from the corpse. Pacemakers must be removed as they explode and will damage the furnace. Dental metal fragments must be removed. The body is burned within the coffin or a cardboard box. Any bone fragments left after they cool are ground in a separate process and added to the ash. Fumes produced are computer controlled. The flue gases are vented to the atmosphere through a refractory-lined flue. The gases are at a very high temperature and are cooled. However, gaseous emissions are by far the greatest source of cremation pollution.
… emissions include carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, sulphur dioxide, hydrogen chloride gas, hydrogen fluoride, mercury vapour . Organic compounds such as benzenes, furans, acetone are also emitted and these react with the hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride under combustion conditions to form polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) both of which are carcinogens. A study by the Cremation Association of North America has found that filtering crematorium fumes has little effect on the toxins released. However, when compared to yearly toxin release world wide, crematoriums contribute only a very small fraction of harmful compounds or greenhouse gases.
= =
Toxic emissions from crematories
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412009002050
= =
http://strangesounds.org/2019/02/radioactive-cremation-arizona-health-problem.html
Radioactive cremation! Cancer patient’s radioactive remains spread radiation all over the cremation chamber. By Strange Sounds – Feb 27, 2019
= =
Surge in Obesity Sparks Crematorium Blazes
= =
Cremation pollution
= =
The potential dangers of medical devices with current cremation practices